Skip to main content

99611

Details

AADF latest year 2024
Region North West
Local authority Tameside
Road name M60
Road type Major
Start junction road 24
End junction road A6140
Link length 3.10km (1.93 miles)
Easting & Northing 391000,397000
Latitude & longitude 53.46967,-2.13705

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2024 Manual count 135,302 105,132 24,197 5,655 0 152 167
2023 Manual count 130,644 99,609 23,729 7,086 0 89 131
2022 Manual count 131,119 101,977 22,718 5,886 0 202 335
2021 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 103,921 76,298 21,118 6,335 0 110 61
2020 Manual count 90,717 66,741 18,067 5,740 0 108 61
2019 Automatic counter 112,767 89,048 17,487 5,852 0 216 164
2018 Manual count 124,991 98,392 19,692 6,470 0 252 185
2017 Automatic counter 107,452 81,520 18,648 6,786 0 344 154
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 116,426 89,760 18,991 7,093 0 411 172
2015 Manual count 114,344 89,033 17,883 6,848 0 406 175
2014 Manual count 110,341 85,896 17,288 6,733 0 258 166
2013 Manual count 102,495 80,289 15,785 6,031 0 205 184
2012 Manual count 107,198 84,460 16,140 6,168 0 289 141
2011 Manual count 110,765 87,803 16,289 6,079 0 381 213
2010 Manual count 112,023 89,579 13,505 8,419 0 316 204
2009 Manual count 118,026 95,783 13,629 8,070 0 407 137
2008 Manual count 110,705 87,198 13,824 9,146 0 379 158
2007 Manual count 118,778 94,888 15,863 7,477 0 389 161
2006 Manual count 102,223 80,209 13,881 7,509 0 267 357
2005 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 107,357 84,199 14,515 7,809 0 410 424
2004 Manual count 106,947 84,199 14,023 7,911 0 406 408
2003 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 97,423 77,562 12,344 6,776 0 420 321
2002 Manual count 99,208 79,470 11,985 7,069 0 372 312
2001 Manual count 78,769 62,013 9,699 6,486 0 269 302

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 99611 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 99611 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 24
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 48
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 432

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.