Skip to main content

99555

Details

AADF latest year 2017
Region North West
Local authority Lancashire
Road name M6
Road type Major
Start junction road 29
End junction road 29A
Link length 0.50km (0.31 miles)
Easting & Northing 356600,424730
Latitude & longitude 53.71718,-2.6591

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2017 Manual count 81,321 59,513 12,982 8,407 0 281 137
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 79,633 61,212 10,148 7,712 0 208 353
2015 Manual count 78,334 60,716 9,556 7,496 0 205 361
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 68,330 53,303 7,597 7,153 0 80 198
2013 Manual count 66,971 52,845 6,921 6,938 0 81 187
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 61,382 46,417 7,548 7,092 0 118 207
2011 Manual count 62,023 47,289 7,363 7,045 0 129 197
2010 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 78,992 60,288 8,531 9,142 0 542 489
2009 Manual count 80,142 61,393 8,447 9,289 0 581 432
2008 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 62,066 47,358 6,831 7,432 0 241 204
2007 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 63,171 48,474 6,671 7,640 0 229 157
2006 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 62,490 48,137 6,299 7,694 0 221 139
2005 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 62,017 48,137 5,987 7,570 0 182 141
2004 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 61,854 48,137 5,785 7,615 0 181 136
2003 Manual count 59,773 46,825 5,250 7,268 0 203 227
2002 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 59,602 45,273 6,267 7,430 0 135 497
2001 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 58,479 44,692 5,836 7,317 0 139 495
2000 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 56,805 43,391 5,521 7,272 0 137 484

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 99555 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 99555 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 18
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 36
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 144

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.