Skip to main content

81230

Details

AADF latest year 2024
Region Yorkshire and The Humber
Local authority Sheffield
Road name A6102
Road type Major
Start junction road A61
End junction road A1602
Link length 0.50km (0.31 miles)
Easting & Northing 433139,390854
Latitude & longitude 53.41348,-1.5029

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2024 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 12,255 10,541 1,395 89 66 58 173
2023 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 12,070 10,383 1,370 88 65 57 172
2022 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 11,856 10,192 1,347 89 67 57 170
2021 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 11,082 9,542 1,243 86 74 53 158
2020 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,085 8,661 1,140 80 91 50 153
2019 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 13,096 11,402 1,292 91 80 67 243
2018 Manual count 12,968 11,261 1,303 92 73 72 240
2017 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 16,701 13,558 2,577 157 62 68 341
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 16,695 13,659 2,448 156 64 68 365
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 16,305 13,449 2,241 152 69 69 394
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 15,927 13,188 2,137 158 74 79 365
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 15,451 12,839 1,998 152 77 82 380
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 15,460 12,954 1,923 147 78 74 363
2011 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 15,613 13,159 1,900 143 82 77 334
2010 Manual count 15,482 13,198 1,702 137 74 91 354
2009 Manual count 14,482 12,255 1,433 221 121 100 473
2008 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 16,314 13,881 1,573 273 154 163 424

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 81230 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 81230 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 17
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 34
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 72

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.