Skip to main content
Road traffic statistics

81229

Details

AADF latest year 2024
Region Yorkshire and The Humber
Local authority Sheffield
Road name A6102
Road type Major
Start junction road A6102
End junction road A61
Link length 0.50km (0.31 miles)
Easting & Northing 433491,390888
Latitude & longitude 53.41376,-1.49761

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2024 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,839 5,597 898 243 15 26 75
2023 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,739 5,514 882 244 15 25 75
2022 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,626 5,412 867 248 15 26 74
2021 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,198 5,067 800 238 17 24 69
2020 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 5,644 4,599 734 222 20 22 67
2019 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,274 6,055 831 252 18 30 105
2018 Manual count 7,207 5,980 839 252 16 32 104
2017 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,372 6,417 1,535 260 22 27 134
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,350 6,464 1,458 257 23 26 143
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,134 6,365 1,335 252 24 27 154
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,950 6,242 1,273 262 26 31 143
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,707 6,077 1,190 259 27 32 149
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,699 6,131 1,145 252 27 29 142
2011 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,772 6,228 1,132 251 29 30 131
2010 Manual count 7,675 6,246 1,014 241 27 35 139
2009 Manual count 8,034 6,657 815 405 41 34 123
2008 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 16,413 13,553 1,980 516 52 121 243

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 81229 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 81229 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 17
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 33
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 72

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.