Skip to main content

81227

Details

AADF latest year 2024
Region Yorkshire and The Humber
Local authority Sheffield
Road name A6102
Road type Major
Start junction road A6135
End junction road A6102
Link length 3.30km (2.05 miles)
Easting & Northing 434924,390653
Latitude & longitude 53.41156,-1.47607

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2024 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 14,237 12,327 1,514 283 95 70 44
2023 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 14,025 12,143 1,487 283 94 68 43
2022 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 13,781 11,919 1,463 287 96 69 43
2021 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 12,888 11,159 1,349 276 107 63 40
2020 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 11,722 10,129 1,238 257 131 60 39
2019 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 15,171 13,335 1,402 292 114 80 61
2018 Manual count 15,023 13,170 1,415 292 104 86 61
2017 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 16,812 13,878 2,106 669 39 64 95
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 16,814 13,981 2,001 667 41 63 102
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 16,428 13,767 1,832 655 44 65 110
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 16,103 13,499 1,747 682 47 73 102
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 15,622 13,143 1,633 664 49 77 106
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 15,648 13,260 1,571 647 49 69 101
2011 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 15,823 13,470 1,553 635 52 72 93
2010 Manual count 15,697 13,510 1,392 612 48 85 98
2009 Manual count 15,582 13,285 1,579 469 93 121 128
2008 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 16,413 13,553 1,980 516 52 121 243

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 81227 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 81227 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 17
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 33
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 72

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.