Skip to main content
Road traffic statistics

81154

Details

AADF latest year 2024
Region East Midlands
Local authority Rutland
Road name A606
Road type Major
Start junction road A606
End junction road A6003
Link length 4.40km (2.73 miles)
Easting & Northing 485750,310120
Latitude & longitude 52.68202,-0.73299

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2024 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 12,943 10,723 1,635 512 75 41 33
2023 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 12,791 10,595 1,606 515 78 41 33
2022 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 12,524 10,339 1,575 532 83 45 34
2021 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 11,636 9,633 1,414 517 85 40 31
2020 Manual count 10,592 8,809 1,235 483 113 39 27
2019 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,513 7,288 1,621 501 18 63 40
2018 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,497 7,272 1,626 500 15 59 40
2017 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,455 7,307 1,553 493 15 60 42
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,370 7,316 1,467 482 15 62 43
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,164 7,226 1,359 473 15 62 44
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,081 7,277 1,248 451 16 62 43
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,054 7,295 1,199 463 19 56 42
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,037 7,311 1,158 471 20 55 42
2011 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,077 7,370 1,120 487 21 59 41
2010 Manual count 9,114 7,415 1,091 515 24 54 39
2009 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,588 7,454 1,179 754 26 146 55
2008 Manual count 9,675 7,476 1,181 821 23 144 53
2007 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,849 5,337 880 531 8 58 43

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 81154 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 81154 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 18
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 35
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 72

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.