Skip to main content
Road traffic statistics

81070

Details

AADF latest year 2020
Region East Midlands
Local authority Rutland
Road name A1
Road type Major
Start junction road A1(T)
End junction road LA Boundary
Link length 2.40km (1.49 miles)
Easting & Northing 494420,317000
Latitude & longitude 52.74241,-0.60281

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2020 Dependent on a neighbouring counted link 32,716 18,657 6,041 7,887 1 110 22
2019 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 46,294 29,962 8,020 8,017 0 182 113
2018 Dependent on a neighbouring counted link 46,090 29,711 8,050 8,031 0 180 118
2017 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 35,755 22,579 5,044 7,990 0 63 80
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 35,231 22,589 4,734 7,768 0 62 78
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 34,085 21,933 4,384 7,633 0 60 76
2014 Dependent on a neighbouring counted link 33,566 22,086 4,027 7,318 0 60 75
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 31,511 20,449 4,180 6,809 1 42 30
2012 Dependent on a neighbouring counted link 31,458 20,495 4,039 6,852 1 41 31
2011 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 45,621 33,346 5,080 6,942 0 147 106
2010 Dependent on a neighbouring counted link 45,765 33,547 4,946 7,035 0 135 102
2009 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 36,196 23,419 4,613 7,833 0 230 101
2008 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 36,840 23,490 4,622 8,402 0 228 98
2007 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 37,651 24,267 4,453 8,623 0 216 92
2006 Manual count 36,490 24,075 3,931 8,190 0 209 85
2005 Manual count 29,222 17,535 4,122 7,330 0 198 37

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 81070 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 81070 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 16
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 32
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 48

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.