Skip to main content

80482

Details

AADF latest year 2021
Region South East
Local authority Brighton and Hove
Road name A23
Road type Major
Start junction road A270-Upper Lewes Road
End junction road A270
Link length 0.40km (0.25 miles)
Easting & Northing 531493,105172
Latitude & longitude 50.83115,-0.13417

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2021 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,890 6,939 1,434 169 307 103 244
2020 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,106 6,299 1,316 158 376 97 237
2019 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,469 8,293 1,491 180 329 132 375
2018 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,385 8,190 1,504 180 299 141 370
2017 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,486 8,281 1,476 179 271 142 408
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,500 8,342 1,402 177 283 141 437
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,289 8,214 1,284 175 304 144 472
2014 Manual count 10,059 8,055 1,224 179 327 163 438
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,811 7,781 1,602 204 183 131 92
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,798 7,851 1,541 201 185 118 88
2011 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,900 7,975 1,523 198 196 123 81
2010 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,789 7,999 1,365 193 178 146 86
2009 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,739 8,047 1,278 185 177 153 76
2008 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,547 7,874 1,259 200 177 137 77
2007 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,714 8,051 1,233 199 158 143 88
2006 Manual count 9,816 8,182 1,171 216 253 150 97

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 80482 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 80482 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 16
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 16
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 24

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.