Skip to main content

80433

Details

AADF latest year 2021
Region Yorkshire and The Humber
Local authority Wakefield
Road name A639
Road type Major
Start junction road A6539/A639
End junction road M62
Link length 2.00km (1.24 miles)
Easting & Northing 443630,423830
Latitude & longitude 53.7091,-1.34049

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2021 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,498 6,928 1,265 165 25 40 100
2020 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,738 6,289 1,160 154 31 38 97
2019 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,974 8,279 1,315 175 27 51 154
2018 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,884 8,177 1,326 175 25 54 152
2017 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,966 8,268 1,302 173 22 55 168
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,972 8,329 1,237 172 23 54 179
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,754 8,201 1,132 171 25 55 194
2014 Manual count 9,541 8,042 1,080 176 27 63 180
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,517 5,865 1,157 180 13 30 285
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,505 5,917 1,113 175 13 27 273
2011 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,564 6,011 1,100 174 14 28 251
2010 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,479 6,029 986 166 12 33 265
2009 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,418 6,065 923 161 12 35 234
2008 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,285 5,935 910 173 12 31 236
2007 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,441 6,069 892 177 10 31 272
2006 Manual count 8,292 6,883 899 195 17 46 269

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 80433 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 80433 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 16
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 32
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 48

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.