Skip to main content
Road traffic statistics

77923

Details

AADF latest year 2018
Region North West
Local authority East Cheshire
Road name A533
Road type Major
Start junction road Cleaford Crescent
End junction road Moss Lane, Sandbach
Link length 4.30km (2.67 miles)
Easting & Northing 373000,362960
Latitude & longitude 53.16309,-2.40529

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2018 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,315 6,553 1,170 518 36 25 49
2017 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,288 6,584 1,118 509 37 25 51
2016 Manual count 8,224 6,592 1,056 497 36 26 53
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,474 7,100 1,860 398 14 48 69
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,426 7,185 1,737 387 14 50 68
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,193 7,085 1,616 377 18 48 66
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,222 7,219 1,506 378 18 48 72
2011 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,368 7,427 1,435 381 19 52 73
2010 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,254 7,404 1,356 376 22 48 70
2009 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,364 7,548 1,318 376 22 54 68
2008 Manual count 9,471 7,640 1,293 418 19 52 68
2007 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,370 7,177 1,283 735 28 92 83
2006 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,328 7,289 1,161 682 27 118 78
2005 Manual count 9,147 7,168 1,109 680 29 109 81
2004 Manual count 10,295 8,188 1,039 872 28 101 95
2003 Manual count 9,051 7,153 1,018 701 12 91 88
2002 Manual count 8,932 7,005 954 776 29 107 90
2001 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,721 6,807 946 776 27 105 87
2000 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,474 6,603 895 796 31 95 85

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 77923 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 77923 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 19
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 38
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 144

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.